All times are UTC


It is currently Thu Nov 28, 2024 6:49 pm



Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 53 posts ]  Go to page 1, 2, 3  Next
Author Message
 Post subject: Smaug, how the hell is GW going to pull that off????
PostPosted: Sat Dec 22, 2012 3:01 am 
Craftsman
Craftsman
User avatar
Offline

Joined: Tue Feb 15, 2011 6:54 pm
Posts: 483
My first impression of him was his massive size, I was expecting something more the size of Draco from Dragonheart, boy was I wrong. As the title says, how the hell is GW going to do this? They going to release a pair of legs one dragon base each foot and call it good? Forgeworld seems to be the only real option...and I'm doubting they'll even attempt it.
Top
  Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject: Re: Smaug, how the hell is GW going to pull that off????
PostPosted: Sat Dec 22, 2012 4:34 am 
Loremaster
Loremaster
User avatar
Offline

Joined: Fri Jan 18, 2008 5:03 pm
Posts: 1984
Location: Manitoba, Canada
Images: 1
RangerofTheNorth wrote:
My first impression of him was his massive size, I was expecting something more the size of Draco from Dragonheart, boy was I wrong. As the title says, how the hell is GW going to do this? They going to release a pair of legs one dragon base each foot and call it good? Forgeworld seems to be the only real option...and I'm doubting they'll even attempt it.

Like the mumak, they'll scale it way down. It'll still be huge though.
Top
  Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject: Re: Smaug, how the hell is GW going to pull that off????
PostPosted: Sat Dec 22, 2012 7:48 am 
Ringwraith
Ringwraith
User avatar
Offline

Joined: Mon Jul 18, 2005 2:56 pm
Posts: 3736
Location: The Height of Nonsense
Not as huge as the pricetag...

_________________
Published ebooks:
Instrument of the Empire
A Note of Defiance
Phantom Ships, Ghost Flotilla
More to come!
Top
  Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject: Re: Smaug, how the hell is GW going to pull that off????
PostPosted: Sat Dec 22, 2012 12:33 pm 
Kinsman
Kinsman
User avatar
Offline

Joined: Tue Jan 31, 2012 11:15 am
Posts: 52
Location: Lincolnshire, UK
Images: 12
I have a feeling that it will be the biggest model they will do. I can't see Forge World doing anything to do with LOTR or the Hobbit as it's a separate part of the company, and only deals with the 40k and WFB stuff (with the notable exception of the Watchtower)

But you're right, no matter how big it is, it will have a sky high price. If the normal Dragon is £44 in finecast, think what a Dragon 2/3x times the size will cost, even in plastic.

_________________
Baruk Khazâd! Khazâd ai-mênu!!
Top
  Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject: Re: Smaug, how the hell is GW going to pull that off????
PostPosted: Sat Dec 22, 2012 2:14 pm 
Elven Elder
Elven Elder
User avatar
Offline

Joined: Thu Jun 23, 2011 3:04 pm
Posts: 6308
Location: Wandering around looking for Middle-earth
Images: 58
ASs the avengers says.


SMAUG WILL BE SCALED DOWN JUST LIKE ALL OF THEIR LARGE MONSTERS IN PARTICULAR THE MUMAK AND BALROG.

Funny noone mentions the Stone Giants.

Also, I barely read your post so as to avoid any spoilers, but I goot the general jist, and the answer to that is simple.

And of course the price will be huge. Don't expect Smaug to cost less than £60.

_________________
"I am the Flying Spagetti Monster. Thou shall have no other monsters before me"
-FSM.
Top
  Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject: Re: Smaug, how the hell is GW going to pull that off????
PostPosted: Sat Dec 22, 2012 2:19 pm 
Wayfarer
Wayfarer
Offline

Joined: Sat Dec 22, 2012 1:46 pm
Posts: 12
I think though it depends on how well their current stuff sells. If the Hobbit game sells poorly, as some have imagined, then I doubt that they'll make a massive kit.
Top
  Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject: Re: Smaug, how the hell is GW going to pull that off????
PostPosted: Sat Dec 22, 2012 3:09 pm 
Craftsman
Craftsman
User avatar
Offline

Joined: Tue Feb 15, 2011 6:54 pm
Posts: 483
Even if its scaled down, inevitably,the Mumak is pretty close already to its proper size.
Top
  Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject: Re: Smaug, how the hell is GW going to pull that off????
PostPosted: Sat Dec 22, 2012 3:15 pm 
Elven Elder
Elven Elder
User avatar
Offline

Joined: Thu Jun 23, 2011 3:04 pm
Posts: 6308
Location: Wandering around looking for Middle-earth
Images: 58
RangerofTheNorth wrote:
Even if its scaled down, inevitably,the Mumak is pretty close already to its proper size.

No it isn't. The Muak is between 1/2 and a 1/4 of the size it should be.

_________________
"I am the Flying Spagetti Monster. Thou shall have no other monsters before me"
-FSM.
Top
  Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject: Re: Smaug, how the hell is GW going to pull that off????
PostPosted: Sat Dec 22, 2012 4:33 pm 
Craftsman
Craftsman
User avatar
Offline

Joined: Tue Feb 15, 2011 6:54 pm
Posts: 483
I'm basing that off the dead mumak that was an actual prop, not the cgi ones that changed size throughout the scene. Look at the foot next to the actors and then look at the miniatures, the difference is negligible.
Top
  Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject: Re: Smaug, how the hell is GW going to pull that off????
PostPosted: Sat Dec 22, 2012 4:53 pm 
Elven Elder
Elven Elder
User avatar
Offline

Joined: Thu Jun 23, 2011 3:04 pm
Posts: 6308
Location: Wandering around looking for Middle-earth
Images: 58
RangerofTheNorth wrote:
I'm basing that off the dead mumak that was an actual prop, not the cgi ones that changed size throughout the scene. Look at the foot next to the actors and then look at the miniatures, the difference is negligible.


I am basing it on the facts that

a) The Mukak's feet are about the same size as a horse.

b) The Howdah can comfortably fit 4 times as many Haradrim in the Howdah. (The reason I said 2-4 times is because of the bases)

_________________
"I am the Flying Spagetti Monster. Thou shall have no other monsters before me"
-FSM.
Top
  Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject: Re: Smaug, how the hell is GW going to pull that off????
PostPosted: Sat Dec 22, 2012 5:17 pm 
Craftsman
Craftsman
User avatar
Offline

Joined: Tue Feb 15, 2011 6:54 pm
Posts: 483
Just going to ignore the comment about the bases, could only find this pic if the dead one, the foots pony sized. Never said out was the right size, but within 25 more mass is close enough for me. Otherwise it'd be hard to play with.
Image

BACK ON TOPIC
Talking to one of my GW buddies rumor at corporate is they're going Resin, I said that's crazy, but it makes sense. They'll be able to produce it for alot less then if they went plastic.
Top
  Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject: Re: Smaug, how the hell is GW going to pull that off????
PostPosted: Sat Dec 22, 2012 6:02 pm 
Elven Warrior
Elven Warrior
User avatar
Offline

Joined: Wed Oct 05, 2011 4:06 pm
Posts: 891
A lot less...? Not money for us!? Maybe for them, but I see GWS doing it cheap, charging a fortune, but we will see, so far some of the Hobbit and old LotR stuff are just crazy prices!

_________________
Leonardis
Army blog:Http://www.thewarofthering.blogspot.co.uk/
Top
  Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject: Re: Smaug, how the hell is GW going to pull that off????
PostPosted: Sat Dec 22, 2012 6:15 pm 
Elven Elder
Elven Elder
User avatar
Offline

Joined: Thu Jun 23, 2011 3:04 pm
Posts: 6308
Location: Wandering around looking for Middle-earth
Images: 58
RangerofTheNorth wrote:
Just going to ignore the comment about the bases, could only find this pic if the dead one, the foots pony sized. Never said out was the right size, but within 25 more mass is close enough for me. Otherwise it'd be hard to play with.
Image

BACK ON TOPIC
Talking to one of my GW buddies rumor at corporate is they're going Resin, I said that's crazy, but it makes sense. They'll be able to produce it for alot less then if they went plastic.


Firstly, read my post, i said I was discounting bases.

Secondly, I meant the height of the foot, not the width of it,

Thirdly, ompare that photo to the Mumak, thre Mumak in that photo is easily twice the size.

Never mind.

ON TOPIC: Smaug will probably be in Finecast. At least that is what I would have said before they released Bert, Will and Tom in plastic even though you can only have one of each. So who knows now.

_________________
"I am the Flying Spagetti Monster. Thou shall have no other monsters before me"
-FSM.
Top
  Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject: Re: Smaug, how the hell is GW going to pull that off????
PostPosted: Sat Dec 22, 2012 6:30 pm 
Craftsman
Craftsman
User avatar
Offline

Joined: Tue Feb 15, 2011 6:54 pm
Posts: 483
Leonardis wrote:
A lot less...? Not money for us!? Maybe for them, but I see GWS doing it cheap, charging a fortune, but we will see, so far some of the Hobbit and old LotR stuff are just crazy prices!



It will probably be outrageous in price, just like with finecast they're producing the same figure, charging more, but it costs less to make. They could do a humongous Smaug in resin and it would cost them so much less than if they went plastic, but neither scenario benefits us. He'll probably be at least $ 150, that's being generous. I'm expecting in the $200-300 range. Which I'm ok with if its the biggest possible version and is amazing.

One other option could be the toyline.The bridge direct will probably make a decent sized Smaug figure and if GW decide to go massively undersized with theirs, could with some customizing and paint be a viable option.
Top
  Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject: Re: Smaug, how the hell is GW going to pull that off????
PostPosted: Sat Dec 22, 2012 9:57 pm 
Loremaster
Loremaster
User avatar
Offline

Joined: Mon Aug 21, 2006 12:53 pm
Posts: 1827
Location: CO, USA
Sadly I think it's going to be a failure on the table. It will have to be significantly more potent than the existing dragon profile considering how it is shown in the film and book.

Historically such models are just not fun on the table for one side or the other (or both). They might be able to pull it off but it's going to take a lot of play testing. And what would the points of something that potent be? 1000 points...maybe more? If they under cut it's potency it's going to disappoint.

If it is a good profile afterall I have a feeling getting one of the plastic toy ones (sure to be showing up at your local Toys R Us and Walmart) will probably be a more cost-effective option.

_________________
Wait ye the finish! The fight is not yours.
Beowulf

http://TacticsInMiniature.com
Top
  Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject: Re: Smaug, how the hell is GW going to pull that off????
PostPosted: Sat Dec 22, 2012 10:06 pm 
Kinsman
Kinsman
User avatar
Offline

Joined: Mon Feb 09, 2004 2:44 pm
Posts: 218
Location: Huddersfield, UK
GothmogtheWerewolf wrote:
ASs the avengers says.

Funny noone mentions the Stone Giants.

A.


This is something I thought about, 'would they release a mini and what would the stats be like?'. I haven't got the new rulebook yet but there has been no mention of any stone giant stats and I was slightly disappointed to hear it. I thought the model of a stone giant would be taller than a mumak.

{SPOILER}
The small glimpses we had of Smaug in the movie does make me think it would be one massive dragon for GW to build and it might make the current dragon look like a baby.
Top
  Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject: Re: Smaug, how the hell is GW going to pull that off????
PostPosted: Sun Dec 23, 2012 2:03 am 
Elven Elder
Elven Elder
User avatar
Offline

Joined: Sun Sep 18, 2011 9:42 pm
Posts: 3131
Location: In Angband, at Morgoth's feet.
Beowulf03809 wrote:
Sadly I think it's going to be a failure on the table. It will have to be significantly more potent than the existing dragon profile considering how it is shown in the film and book.

Historically such models are just not fun on the table for one side or the other (or both). They might be able to pull it off but it's going to take a lot of play testing. And what would the points of something that potent be? 1000 points...maybe more? If they under cut it's potency it's going to disappoint.

If it is a good profile afterall I have a feeling getting one of the plastic toy ones (sure to be showing up at your local Toys R Us and Walmart) will probably be a more cost-effective option.

The Balrog pretty much single handedly destroyed Khazad-Dum, which was a MUCH greater kingdom than Erebor and he's only 400 points.

As for the mumak, the current mini would be about 30-40 feet tall. To the top of it's back is ~6in (it's actually 5.5, but if it were standing straight, it would be 6). 1 inch ingame equals about 6 feet (Lurtz is about an inch, and the actor who played him is 6'3") so the Mumak would 36 ft tall. Mumak's were described as being about 50-75 ft tall, so the current mini is about 1/2 scale.

_________________
:saruman "Leave Sauron to me."
If you're in the Raleigh, NC area, let me know.
Top
  Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject: Re: Smaug, how the hell is GW going to pull that off????
PostPosted: Sun Dec 23, 2012 2:26 am 
Craftsman
Craftsman
User avatar
Offline

Joined: Tue Feb 15, 2011 6:54 pm
Posts: 483
Draugluin wrote:
Beowulf03809 wrote:
Sadly I think it's going to be a failure on the table. It will have to be significantly more potent than the existing dragon profile considering how it is shown in the film and book.

Historically such models are just not fun on the table for one side or the other (or both). They might be able to pull it off but it's going to take a lot of play testing. And what would the points of something that potent be? 1000 points...maybe more? If they under cut it's potency it's going to disappoint.

If it is a good profile afterall I have a feeling getting one of the plastic toy ones (sure to be showing up at your local Toys R Us and Walmart) will probably be a more cost-effective option.

The Balrog pretty much single handedly destroyed Khazad-Dum, which was a MUCH greater kingdom than Erebor and he's only 400 points.

As for the mumak, the current mini would be about 30-40 feet tall. To the top of it's back is ~6in (it's actually 5.5, but if it were standing straight, it would be 6). 1 inch ingame equals about 6 feet (Lurtz is about an inch, and the actor who played him is 6'3") so the Mumak would 36 ft tall. Mumak's were described as being about 50-75 ft tall, so the current mini is about 1/2 scale.



Described in the book? Because they weren't in the movie, can't cross compare like that accurately.
Back to Smaug,even if they did him half size he'd be bigger than the Forgeworld Fire Dragon, and I'd be ok with that
Top
  Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject: Re: Smaug, how the hell is GW going to pull that off????
PostPosted: Sun Dec 23, 2012 4:00 am 
Loremaster
Loremaster
User avatar
Offline

Joined: Fri Feb 24, 2012 11:28 am
Posts: 1389
Smaugh will fit mumak´s base size, there isn´t base bigger than that in GW base sizes.
how big he is? quite, but they make it life half its real size, along with wings and tail over passing the base´s edge
price? most likely like the goblin town set for 1 model or a bit more like a warhammer 40k plastic baneblade... be surprised :P
is there rules for smaug on rulebook anyway?

_________________
http://33.media.tumblr.com/c5d31d12524c ... o1_500.gif
Top
  Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject: Re: Smaug, how the hell is GW going to pull that off????
PostPosted: Sun Dec 23, 2012 10:33 am 
Craftsman
Craftsman
User avatar
Offline

Joined: Sat Aug 30, 2008 9:42 pm
Posts: 481
Location: Dartford, Kent
I was chatting with some of the guys in my local GW store about Smaug and his possibilities, we concluded (of course this is speculation) that he would be a plastic kit, and indeed will be bigger than the mumak with a truly massive wing span and probably cost in the region of £100!!!!
Top
  Profile  
Reply with quote  
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 53 posts ]  Go to page 1, 2, 3  Next

All times are UTC


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 180 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
cron