The One Ring
http://wwww.one-ring.co.uk/

Which army is better ?
http://wwww.one-ring.co.uk/viewtopic.php?f=37&t=2090		 Page 1 of 1
Author:  -Saruman- [ Mon Sep 06, 2004 2:32 am ]
Post subject:  Which army is better ?
what army is better overall ? Isengard or Mordor ?
Author:  -Faramir- [ Mon Sep 06, 2004 5:58 pm ]
Post subject: 
uruks are more hard wearing and take more punishment than orcs, but on the other hand orcs have mordor trolls which are very dangerous, and orcs have sauron who is the best mini in the game.
but it depends how big the army your talking about is.
Author:  Elessar15 [ Mon Sep 06, 2004 6:39 pm ]
Post subject: 
I think the Uruks are better. They have a good "F" and a good "S". And their pikes are really good. But Mordor has more choises and more miniatures.
Author:  Grimboldofeastfold [ Mon Sep 06, 2004 6:52 pm ]
Post subject: 
In my opinion, Mordor are far better than Isengard.
They have nearly twice as many numbers in battles which can always swing the battle to their favour. They also have more specialist troop choices such as trolls, morannon orcs, orc trackers and mordor uruk-hai.
Their main disadvantage against isengard is their lack of pikes, crossbows and berserkers, but their superior numbers and trolls often overcome that disadvantage and crush the enemy with their sheer army size.
In 1 on 1 combats they will almost always lose out, as they have an inferior fight, strength and defence to isengard uruk-hai, but a good general may use his/her advanced troop types and his/her numbers to overcome the enemy defences and break the uruks into a rout, for the warg riders to run down any courageous enemys and force them to flee the field, giving Mordor the victory! Mwahahahahahahahaha
So in my opinion Mordor is certainly better than Isengard, and they have my vote!
Hope this helps 8)
Author:  -Faramir- [ Tue Sep 07, 2004 2:51 pm ]
Post subject: 
in one on one fights orcs are rubbish compared to uruks, but when size is considered mordor have larger armies with trolls, wargs and other skilled troops.
so it depends on how big the army is, if your looking to get 40 uruk hai or 48 mordor orcs, id say go for uruk hai :lurtz:
Author:  Aragorn the heir of Isildur [ Tue Sep 07, 2004 5:23 pm ]
Post subject: 
mordor, because they can get trolls, mordor uruk-hai and so much more,

but isenguard is good in its own right cos they've got beserkers and crossbows.
Author:  Dragon Mage [ Wed Sep 08, 2004 12:24 am ]
Post subject: 
i like mordor because of trolls, easterlings, wargs and Saron. But Isengard is very good too with uruk-hai and saruman. but mordor has a much bigger seliction and it gets kinda old painting the same thing over and over again.
Author:  DWARFLORD [ Wed Sep 08, 2004 8:24 pm ]
Post subject: 
ill take isengard 4 the strength of 4 not only on the warriors but on the crossbows, + what other warrior has 2 attacks, courage of 8 & defence og 6 4 only 15 points...beserkers come on now. as i said b4 strength is in strength & defence not in #s & they have a higher strength, fight value, courage & DEFENCE. that will win u a battle.

also saruman & grima will drive u crazy if ur fighting against them
Author:  hobbitsrule22 [ Sun May 30, 2010 11:31 am ]
Post subject: 
isenguard strong infantry and isenguard trolls arent too shabby and then with ultimate shock troopers beserkas (i spelt that right)
Author:  Karvag [ Sun May 30, 2010 11:38 am ]
Post subject: 
the truth is that

ISENGARD OWNS !!!!!!!!!
Author:  Queen Berúthiel [ Sun May 30, 2010 12:30 pm ]
Post subject: 
eh guys check the date one the last post it have been six years
Author:  Karvag [ Sun May 30, 2010 4:49 pm ]
Post subject: 
lol :-D :-D :-D
Author:  ncea [ Mon May 31, 2010 5:25 am ]
Post subject: 
guys... You have posted on 2 posts that have both been over 6 years!!!!!!!!!!!! stop necromancing!!! its pointless!! lol. stop.
Author:  imrail [ Mon May 31, 2010 12:31 pm ]
Post subject: 
Queen Berúthiel wrote:
eh guys check the date one the last post it have been six years


That happenend with another thread yesterday.. lol
Author:  Queen Berúthiel [ Mon May 31, 2010 12:56 pm ]
Post subject: 
imrail wrote:
Queen Berúthiel wrote:
eh guys check the date one the last post it have been six years


That happenend with another thread yesterday.. lol


twice in two days do they know that thread necromancy is wrong<?
Author:  Anduril Blade of Kings [ Mon May 31, 2010 2:28 pm ]
Post subject: 
Queen Berúthiel wrote:
imrail wrote:
Queen Berúthiel wrote:
eh guys check the date one the last post it have been six years


That happenend with another thread yesterday.. lol


twice in two days do they know that thread necromancy is wrong<?


I doubt it.

Karvag, Hobbitsrule, thread necromancy is when you post basically useless stuff in a very old thread. In this case the thread is SIX YEARS old. Most likely this topic will be locked shortly by a mod. Thread necromancy is generally seen as annoying.
Author:  imrail [ Mon May 31, 2010 2:41 pm ]
Post subject: 
Anduril Blade of Kings wrote:
Queen Berúthiel wrote:
imrail wrote:
Queen Berúthiel wrote:
eh guys check the date one the last post it have been six years


That happenend with another thread yesterday.. lol


twice in two days do they know that thread necromancy is wrong<?


I doubt it.

Karvag, Hobbitsrule, thread necromancy is when you post basically useless stuff in a very old thread. In this case the thread is SIX YEARS old. Most likely this topic will be locked shortly by a mod. Thread necromancy is generally seen as annoying.


It is annoying, but by posting in this threads after someone has posted in them.. isn't that also some kind of necromaning?
Author:  Queen Berúthiel [ Mon May 31, 2010 7:56 pm ]
Post subject: 
imrail wrote:
Anduril Blade of Kings wrote:
Queen Berúthiel wrote:
imrail wrote:
Queen Berúthiel wrote:
eh guys check the date one the last post it have been six years


That happenend with another thread yesterday.. lol


twice in two days do they know that thread necromancy is wrong<?


I doubt it.

Karvag, Hobbitsrule, thread necromancy is when you post basically useless stuff in a very old thread. In this case the thread is SIX YEARS old. Most likely this topic will be locked shortly by a mod. Thread necromancy is generally seen as annoying.


It is annoying, but by posting in this threads after someone has posted in them.. isn't that also some kind of necromaning?


I don´t know perhaps?
Author:  ncea [ Tue Jun 01, 2010 5:42 am ]
Post subject: 
Quote:
imrail wrote:
Anduril Blade of Kings wrote:
Queen Berúthiel wrote:
imrail wrote:
Queen Berúthiel wrote:
eh guys check the date one the last post it have been six years


That happenend with another thread yesterday.. lol


twice in two days do they know that thread necromancy is wrong<?


I doubt it.

Karvag, Hobbitsrule, thread necromancy is when you post basically useless stuff in a very old thread. In this case the thread is SIX YEARS old. Most likely this topic will be locked shortly by a mod. Thread necromancy is generally seen as annoying.


It is annoying, but by posting in this threads after someone has posted in them.. isn't that also some kind of necromaning?


I don´t know perhaps?


Lol sorry i just had to make this quote even longer :P :P

Just because i can..
Page 1 of 1 All times are UTC
Powered by phpBB © 2000, 2002, 2005, 2007 phpBB Group
http://www.phpbb.com/